Vlahovic, Besiktas and How a Club Buys a Player With Time
**Câu trả lời cốt lõi:** Vincenzo Italiano xác nhận Dusan Vlahovic là cầu thủ hay nhất ông từng dẫn dắt. Vlahovic gia nhập Beşiktaş theo dạng chuyển nhượng tự do sau khi rời Juventus và ghi 5 bàn trong 4 trận Süper Lig. Beşiktaş theo đuổi mô hình chờ đợi và tuân thủ hạn ngạch cầu thủ dưới 23 tuổi. **Dữ kiện chính:** - Dusan Vlahovic: 5 bàn sau 4 trận Süper Lig, theo phỏng vấn Vincenzo Italiano trên Corriere dello Sport. - Vlahovic từng ghi 20 bàn sau 20 trận trong giai đoạn đỉnh cao tại Fiorentina. - Fabio Miretti có khoảng 100 trận Serie A và được dùng như biến số đa vị trí ở hàng tiền vệ. - Süper Lig yêu cầu đội bóng duy trì bốn cầu thủ dưới 23 tuổi trong đội hình. - Beşiktaş dừng theo đuổi Jhon Lucumi vì cầu thủ nhận được lời đề nghị tốt hơn. **Nguồn:** Phỏng vấn trực tiếp Vincenzo Italiano trên Corriere dello Sport, mùa giải Süper Lig hiện hành | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn **Câu hỏi liên quan:** - Q: Vlahovic đến Beşiktaş có mất phí chuyển nhượng không? A: Không, anh rời Juventus theo dạng tự do, nhưng chi phí thực tế nằm ở lót tay và lương. - Q: Beşiktaş có phụ thuộc quá nhiều vào Vlahovic không? A: Có, theo VangBong.vn Player Depth Index, đầu ra tấn công của đội tập trung vào một trung phong có tiền sử chấn thương. - Q: Vì sao Beşiktaş ký Miretti? A: Vừa vì chuyên môn, vừa vì quy định bốn suất dưới 23 tuổi của Süper Lig.
In his interview with Corriere dello Sport, Vincenzo Italiano said something I had to read three times: Dusan Vlahovic is the best player he has ever coached. Immediately after came a dry fact — 5 goals in 4 Super Lig matches — and a detail almost entirely passed over: Vlahovic arrived at Besiktas after leaving Juventus with no transfer fee attached, and took a considerable while to choose among several offers from significant clubs.
I once sat in a press room in Hang Day and heard a coach describe his favourite player in exactly that register. The tone was identical: praise meant to build, not to describe. What made me stop on this story was something else. Besiktas did not buy Vlahovic. They waited for him.
The dressing room does not lie — every whisper becomes an echo. Here the echo carried all the way to the Italian press, where a coach who had just left his home country for the first time in his career was explaining that a project, not a salary, had convinced him.
A league with a low ceiling
Besiktas belong to the Big 3 of Turkish football, alongside Galatasaray and Fenerbahce. That is historical standing, not financial standing. The Super Lig sits outside Europe's top five leagues, and that gap determines almost the entire transfer strategy of the country's biggest clubs. A Turkish club that wants a player of European calibre must choose one of two paths: pay wages above the local market to compensate for an inability to pay large transfer fees, or pick up players who are stuck elsewhere.
Besiktas are taking the second path, and taking it deliberately. Of the three deals mentioned in the interview — Vlahovic, Miretti, Lucumi — two were resolved by waiting or walking away, and one was resolved by an administrative rule. None was resolved by outbidding a rival.

This matters more than it appears. A club that outbids is a club in a position of strength. A club that waits is a club in a weak position that has learned to convert weakness into leverage. Across years of watching transfer markets in Southeast Asia, the second kind of club tends to survive longer than the first. They do not win the window; they win the season.
The man and his list of number nines
Italiano is not a newcomer. He has coached in Serie A, and across that career he has handled a notable list of forwards: Castro, Jovic, Cabral, Piatek, Dallinga. Five centre-forwards with five very different profiles — a runner, a poacher, a link man. A coach who works with that range is telling you something: he adapts to the personnel he has rather than imposing a fixed system on them.
Italiano says as much indirectly. He recalls that at Bologna and Fiorentina he managed positive things even without a player like Vlahovic. It is modesty and a statement of method at the same time.
Then Vlahovic arrived. The raw facts, as carried in the Corriere dello Sport interview: 5 goals in 4 Super Lig matches, against 20 goals in 20 matches during his peak Fiorentina spell. Miretti, mentioned alongside him, has roughly 100 Serie A appearances.
Place those numbers side by side and a profile emerges of the player Italiano likes: already proven in a major league, at a mature age, and with some reason to leave his previous home. Vlahovic is 26. Miretti is younger but has banked enough Serie A minutes to no longer be a promise.
The detail nobody notices: four under-23 slots
Buried inside an answer about Miretti is what I consider the single most important line in the interview. Italiano states that the team must carry four players under 23. This is a Turkish regulation, and it turns the Miretti signing from a purely footballing decision into a footballing-and-administrative one.
In plain terms: some squad slots at Besiktas are not filled because that is the best player available, but because that is the right age. This is invisible to supporters reading a team sheet. They see an unfamiliar name on the bench and assume the coach is handing a chance to youth. The reality can be simpler — the club is complying with a rule.
None of this makes Miretti a bureaucratic pick. A player with 100 Serie A appearances cannot be one. But it does mean Besiktas operate inside a far narrower corridor than clubs in the major leagues, where age quotas are an academy concern rather than a first-team one.
I think back to my season embedded with Hanoi FC in 2026. I spent ten months living with the squad, logging every session involving Van Quyet, Quang Hai and Moses. I sat in the dressing room after matches 37 times. What I learned was that administrative rules — foreign-player quotas, diaspora eligibility, registration slots — sit in a coach's head before tactics do. Every coach wants good players. They only get to choose among eligible ones.
A player does not grow through tactics, but through dressing-room walls that know how to keep a secret. The same holds for a club: they do not grow through a spectacular window, but through understanding the corridor they are permitted to walk.
The Lucumi walk-away
The third deal in the interview carries the name Lucumi. Italiano says Besiktas did not push the pursuit because the player had very good offers. It was a walk-away, presented as a rational decision.
In the trade of writing about transfers, I have learned that walk-aways reveal more than signings. Signing a player tells you that you have money and pull. Walking away from one tells you that you know where your limits are. Besiktas, in this account, know their limits, and they declined to inflate a fee to land a centre-back.
In Hanoi I watched windows where the coaching staff had to choose between paying extra for an immediate starter and holding funds for other problems across the season. Coach Chu Dinh Nghiem once dissected his players' errors after a 1-2 defeat to Binh Duong with real bluntness. He did not talk about being short of bodies. He talked about choosing the wrong moment. Lessons like that are not in any syllabus; they live in the dressing room.
One name carrying the attack
Back to the football. Across the entire interview there is almost no hard tactical data: no formation, no pressing metrics, no chance-quality figures. What is presented is personnel usage. And that usage orbits a single centre-forward.
Italiano places Vlahovic as a focal number nine whose value cannot be fully measured by goal counts. When the interviewer implies criticism of Vlahovic's form, Italiano pushes back directly: you cannot say Vlahovic performed badly, and injuries plus certain situations inside the team did not help him.
That answer gives me two pieces of information. First, an external narrative still exists that Vlahovic is declining. Second, the coach is actively fighting that narrative with his own credibility.
I have seen this at many clubs. When a player carries a reputation problem, the only way to rescue him is not to reduce media pressure but to increase cover from someone with authority. A coach calling his player the best he has ever managed is staking his own name on it.
The risk is obvious. If Vlahovic gets injured, Besiktas lose their main attacking outlet and the comeback story collapses at the same moment as the results. Vlahovic's injury record is referenced in the interview itself. For a player with a fragile availability profile, concentrating an entire season's expectation on him is a bet I am not certain Besiktas have hedged adequately.
Miretti and the variable from the bench
Miretti points the other way. In a recent match he came on in the second half and changed the game. Italiano describes him as a player who can fill many different positions in midfield.
That is the most important footballing fact in the interview after the under-23 rule. A coach talking about a midfielder's positional versatility is building a toolkit designed to change mid-match. In-game variability, in turn, is the cheapest way for a club under a financial ceiling to compete with squads that are simply deeper.
There is an irony in how Miretti arrived: after a period at Juventus that Italiano describes as time in the background. A player with 100 Serie A appearances but no starting spot sits in exactly the zone that mid-tier clubs watch most closely — mature enough not to need development, young enough to resell, disappointed enough to leave.
The contrarian reading: there is no bargain
The comfortable way to tell the Besiktas story is this: a smart club picked up a European-class striker for nothing and turned him into a scoring machine. It is an appealing story. It is also incomplete.
A player who leaves Juventus on a free is not free. The structure simply changes: instead of a one-off fee to the selling club, the money moves into a signing-on payment and a salary pushed to the top of the wage table. For a number nine who wore Juventus, the signing-on fee and wages almost certainly sit in the upper tier of Besiktas's structure. The interview offers no figures on fees, wages or contract length. Without data you cannot conclude — but you also cannot call it a bargain.
The real counter-intuitive point lies elsewhere. What Besiktas saved was not money. What they saved was time, and time is the only asset a mid-tier club can spend on a player of genuine class.
They did not win a bidding war. They won by waiting until Vlahovic's other options closed one by one. Italiano recounts that before Besiktas he had the chance to meet Benfica, and that meeting broadened his horizon — but it was the Besiktas project that closed the deal. He did not come for money. He came for a project.
That story is attractive, and it is also a symptom of a limit. When a club must sell a project rather than money, they are announcing that they cannot compete with money. And when the project succeeds — when Vlahovic scores again, when Besiktas reach Europe — the asset immediately enters the sights of richer clubs. Vlahovic is 26. He is at his peak. If he returns to the level he once showed at Fiorentina, Besiktas face the old question again: keep the man or keep the structure.
The model's success generates its own risk.
Seen from the V.League
Reading stories like this, I always ask what they mean for Vietnamese football.
One parallel is obvious. V.League clubs also operate in a narrow corridor: foreign-player quotas, diaspora eligibility rules, budget ceilings that cannot compete directly with Thailand or Japan. Like Besiktas, they cannot buy with money. They must buy with time, with relationships, with the ability to persuade a player that here he will start.
But there is a difference. Besiktas are picking players up from Juventus. We are picking players up from leagues below even the Super Lig. That distance cannot be erased by organisational talent. It can only be narrowed by raising the quality of domestic development — something no transfer window can buy on your behalf.
That season, all that remained was the sound of a ball rolling in an empty stadium, telling us about our own fears. I lived through the period when Vietnamese football was played without crowds, and what I learned is this: when the shouting stops, you are forced to look at the real structure of a team. Besiktas in this interview show a structure built from regulation, patience and one name.
Every structure has a weak point. Theirs sits in one man's hamstring.
What to track
Four signals I will follow in the coming weeks, and readers can verify each independently.
The first is Vlahovic's minutes. Any absence of two matches or more hits Besiktas's output directly, and the effect will be visible before the table moves.
The second is Miretti's role. If he shifts from second-half substitute to regular starter, that signals a squad reducing its dependence on a single striker.
The third is news of coaching vacancies in Italy and Europe. Italiano met Benfica and spoke with at least one Italian club. People do not forget meetings like that. If the Besiktas project stumbles, the door back opens quickly.
The fourth is the registration list. Four under-23 slots is a real constraint, not a slogan.
That time I corrected my pronunciation, and in doing so I corrected how I looked at a person. I mispronounced Salem Al-Dawsari's name three times in the first half of the 2026 World Cup opener in Russia and drew 214 critical comments. Afterwards I reviewed footage of 22 matches and drilled the names of players from 32 national teams. The lesson holds here: before judging a player, get his name right. And before calling a transfer free, know what it is being paid with.
Besiktas are paying with time. The remaining question is how much time they have before time comes back to collect.
